Differences between revisions 5 and 7 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 5 as of 2006-11-17 20:42:23
Size: 3622
Editor: lfrq80
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2006-11-21 21:06:05
Size: 4747
Editor: lfrq80
Comment: Generalized to account for other uses of the InTrans notation
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from Molecular Interaction Maps/EnzymaticStimulationInTrans
Line 8: Line 9:
|| '''Use Case Name''' : ../EnzymaticStimulationInTrans || || '''Use Case Name''' : ../InTrans ||
Line 21: Line 22:
A user wants specify that a species is an enzyme that stimulates a reaction by binding with another copy of the same species A user wants specify ''in trans'', i.e. that a species is involved in an enzymatic or binding
activity
with another copy of the same species
Line 26: Line 28:
 1. User specifies a species to be the enzymatic stimulator
 1. User specifies a reaction involving that species to be stimulated
 1. User specifies that there is a enzymatic in trans stimulation relationship
 1. User specifies an existing enzymatic stimulation or binding activity
 1. User specieis that the activity is ''in trans''
Line 30: Line 31:

As an alternative to modifying an existing relationship, this use case might be viewed as creating a different relationship in the first place, e.g.

 1. User specifies a species to be the enzymatic stimulator
 1. User specifies a reaction to be stimulated involving the same species
 1. User specifies that there is a stimulation ''in trans'' relationship
 1. User optionally specifies the evidence for the relationship
Line 36: Line 44:
attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans1_061115_dwk.png attachment:intrans1_061121_dwk.png
Line 38: Line 46:
An example using this notation follows: This notation can be used to modify the edges for ../NonCovalentBinding or ../EnzymaticStimulation
Line 40: Line 48:
attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans2_061115_dwk.png attachment:intrans2_061121_dwk.png

attachment:intrans4_061121_dwk.png

An example using this notation for ../EnzymaticStimulation follows:

attachment:intrans5_061121_dwk.png
Line 44: Line 58:
The following example uses intrans for a ../NonCovalentBinding relationship:

attachment:intrans3_061121_dwk.png

In this example, a copy of protein A, binds a domain 1 to another copy of protein A at domain 2.
Line 56: Line 75:
TBD This is a fairly common occurance in the models.
Line 58: Line 77:
== Variations ==

An earlier version of the notation uses small circles instead of the slashes. This earlier notation does not need to be supported.

attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans1_061115_dwk.png

attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans2_061115_dwk.png

Use Case Name : ../InTrans

For Feature : MIMEditor

Editors: DavidKane

TableOfContents([2])

Summary

A user wants specify in trans, i.e. that a species is involved in an enzymatic or binding activity with another copy of the same species

Step-by-Step User Action

  1. User specifies an existing enzymatic stimulation or binding activity
  2. User specieis that the activity is in trans

  3. User optionally specifies the evidence for the relationship

As an alternative to modifying an existing relationship, this use case might be viewed as creating a different relationship in the first place, e.g.

  1. User specifies a species to be the enzymatic stimulator
  2. User specifies a reaction to be stimulated involving the same species
  3. User specifies that there is a stimulation in trans relationship

  4. User optionally specifies the evidence for the relationship

Visual Aides

The Kohn notation for enzymatic stimulation in trans is the following:

attachment:intrans1_061121_dwk.png

This notation can be used to modify the edges for ../NonCovalentBinding or ../EnzymaticStimulation

attachment:intrans2_061121_dwk.png

attachment:intrans4_061121_dwk.png

An example using this notation for ../EnzymaticStimulation follows:

attachment:intrans5_061121_dwk.png

In this example, a copy of protein A, catalyzes the phosphorylation of another copy of protein A.

The following example uses intrans for a ../NonCovalentBinding relationship:

attachment:intrans3_061121_dwk.png

In this example, a copy of protein A, binds a domain 1 to another copy of protein A at domain 2.

Requirements for Cytoscape

Assuming that this can use the same approach that is used for ../ShowInhibition, it could be modeled as a Hyperedge containing node1: C (hyperedge attribute: enzymatic stimulation in trans), node2: A, node3: A

View: Use case for hyperedge view

Importance

This is a fairly common occurance in the models.

Variations

An earlier version of the notation uses small circles instead of the slashes. This earlier notation does not need to be supported.

attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans1_061115_dwk.png

attachment:enzymaticstimulationintrans2_061115_dwk.png

Other Examples

Comments

Shared ../MimEditorUseCaseComments

This is a special case of an ../EnzymaticStimulation. It is intended to clarify that more than one copy of a particular protein is involved in the interaction.

This could be modeled in BioPAX as a Catalysis object (e.g. Catalysis object with participants = a Biochemical Reaction object and a enzyme A, Controlled = the Biochemical Reaction object (a reaction in trans as defined in "in trans reactions"cannot communicate that is specifically a covalent phosphorylation reaction, Controller=A, Control-Type = Activation, and Direction = IRREVERSIBLE-LEFT-TO-RIGHT)

PageComment2

Molecular_Interaction_Maps/InTrans (last edited 2009-02-12 01:03:34 by localhost)

Funding for Cytoscape is provided by a federal grant from the U.S. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the Na tional Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number GM070743-01. Corporate funding is provided through a contract from Unilever PLC.

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux