Cytoscape Wiki|
Size: 700
Comment: Are Labels something we need for Cytoscape 2.2?
|
Size: 1196
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
|
IlianaAvila - 10/04/05 -- I agree that grouping attributes is necessary, for example, for expression data (experiment has a series of conditions). But, I think they should not be named "labels". It is confusing. Rowan: Does your attribute browser make use of "labels"? If so, if we want to use your browser for 2.3, we need to have "labels", but please, lets rename them! James McIninch - 10/6/05 -- I believe that the consensus (flickr, deli.cio.us, etc.) is that these are called "tags". |
RowanChristmas 10/03/05 -- Labels are, I think, a really nice way to organize large sets of attributes. For browser functionality, they take the place of the "tabs" we used to have, and provide a faster, more configurable browsing. This also lets me do export of certain attributes on different subsets of nodes/edges.
EthanCerami - 10/04/05 -- Sounds like a good idea. Is this a feature that we need for Cytoscape 2.2, or can we defer it until a later date? The reason I ask is that getting us all to agree on CyAttributes is probably going to take some time, and we might be better able to reach resolution if we focus on core functionality first. Anyone else have thoughts on this?
IlianaAvila - 10/04/05 -- I agree that grouping attributes is necessary, for example, for expression data (experiment has a series of conditions). But, I think they should not be named "labels". It is confusing. Rowan: Does your attribute browser make use of "labels"? If so, if we want to use your browser for 2.3, we need to have "labels", but please, lets rename them!
James McIninch - 10/6/05 -- I believe that the consensus (flickr, deli.cio.us, etc.) is that these are called "tags".