Differences between revisions 3 and 6 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2006-11-17 15:47:39
Size: 2982
Editor: lfrq80
Comment: Reorganizing the MIM pages
Revision 6 as of 2007-05-30 15:39:06
Size: 3358
Editor: 142
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from Molecular Interaction Maps/Degradation
Line 8: Line 9:
|| '''Use Case Name''' : Degradation || || '''Use Case Name''' : ../SpeciesDegradation ||
Line 22: Line 23:
A user wants to describe the possibility that a protein is degraded as part of a StoichiometricConversion. A user wants to describe the possibility that a protein is degraded as part of a ../StoichiometricConversion.
Line 28: Line 29:
 1. User specifies a StoichiometricConversion with this protein  1. User specifies a ../StoichiometricConversion with this protein
Line 62: Line 63:
Shared MimEditorUseCaseComments Shared ../MimEditorUseCaseComments
Line 64: Line 65:
In the context of a StoichiometricConversion, the BioPax representation would basically be the same as any other StoichiometricConversion, except that the degradation products would be described as small molecules, which would not be used in subsequent reactions. In the context of a ../StoichiometricConversion, the BioPax representation would basically be the same as any other ../StoichiometricConversion, except that the degradation products would be described as small molecules, which would not be used in subsequent reactions.
Line 66: Line 67:
[[PageComment2]] ----
AllanKuchinsky - 2007-01-22 05:15:47
 
Is there the need for special 'constant' Node(s) in Cytoscape to represent constructs like degradation?  Are there special semantics associated with degradation 'nodes', e.g. would one ever want to assign attributes to a particular degradation 'node'?

Use Case Name : ../SpeciesDegradation

For Feature : MIMEditor

Editors: DavidKane

TableOfContents([2])

Summary

A user wants to describe the possibility that a protein is degraded as part of a ../StoichiometricConversion.

Step-by-Step User Action

  1. User specifies a protein to be degraded
  2. User specifies a ../StoichiometricConversion with this protein

  3. User specifies the result of the conversion is degradation
  4. User specifies the evidence for this relationship

Visual Aides

The Kohn notation for degradation is the following:

attachment:degradation1_061115_dwk.png

An example of the degradation symbol used as the result of a conversion follows:

attachment:degradation2_061115_dwk.png

The color in this example is convention, and is not an essential element in the notation.

Requirements for Cytoscape

TBD

Importance

This is a fairly common reaction.

Other Examples

Comments

Shared ../MimEditorUseCaseComments

In the context of a ../StoichiometricConversion, the BioPax representation would basically be the same as any other ../StoichiometricConversion, except that the degradation products would be described as small molecules, which would not be used in subsequent reactions.


AllanKuchinsky - 2007-01-22 05:15:47

Is there the need for special 'constant' Node(s) in Cytoscape to represent constructs like degradation?  Are there special semantics associated with degradation 'nodes', e.g. would one ever want to assign attributes to a particular degradation 'node'?

Molecular_Interaction_Maps/SpeciesDegradation (last edited 2009-02-12 01:03:30 by localhost)

Funding for Cytoscape is provided by a federal grant from the U.S. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the Na tional Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number GM070743-01. Corporate funding is provided through a contract from Unilever PLC.

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux