Size: 1692
Comment:
|
Size: 2332
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 17: | Line 17: |
. Issue: given the funding structure, is there enough incentive for groups to develop good documentation/tutorials? Suggestion: be creative in supplying a foundation that users can extend with Help documentation. Also, ISB may have some funding for this kind of work -- this should be brought up at the board meeting. | . Issue: given the funding structure, is there enough incentive for groups to develop good documentation/tutorials? Suggestion: be creative in supplying a foundation that users can extend with Help documentation. Also, ISB may have some funding for this kind of work -- this should be brought up at the board meeting. |
Line 26: | Line 26: |
. suggestion: have the input dialog indicate what programs can be used to view the different types of data files why don't users look at the sample data . some examples too large to be viable -- unfortunately BIND_human and BIND_yeast show up first in the list of sample files. Suggestion: have a demo directory. GalFiltered files are quite useful, should appear first. . Distinguish files created by people from those created by machines. . ACTION ITEMS generate a demo directory . . users discouraged when they see examples from another domain. Suggestion: work with user community to expand the breadth of the examples. |
Notes from Cytoscape Hackathon
Observations on Cytoscape Usability (Melissa)
Motivations: assess Cytoscape usability from biologists perspective, address stumbling blocks in the UI, assess biologists respeonse to vizmapper and filters.
Interviews with 9 users, conducted in workspace, presented in context of users' data and analyses, observed how users worked with software and explore new functionality.
Ran a brainstorming/prototyping workshop with users from usability studies, 2 groups, each group selected one topic to prototype with screen-dumps, post-its, etc. and were videotaped.
Issues raised were:
Documentation:
PDF-format manual too monolithic, HTML preferred
Online tutorials not used -- they want tutorials oriented around biological tasks, not software functionality
- Question: how does this fit with Cytoscape's being domain-neutral? Suggestion: have a top-level set of domain-specific tutorials, with pointers to more detailed software functionality tutorials.
- Issue: given the funding structure, is there enough incentive for groups to develop good documentation/tutorials? Suggestion: be creative in supplying a foundation that users can extend with Help documentation. Also, ISB may have some funding for this kind of work -- this should be brought up at the board meeting.
- Also, a glossary would be critical
- Suggestion: incorporate the tutorials more with the software
Data Import and Export
exporting data from Excel into Cytoscape is a big bottleneck.
PSI-MI now has an excel template that we could use when importing protein-protein interactions.
input file requirements not clearly understood
- suggestion: have the input dialog indicate what programs can be used to view the different types of data files
why don't users look at the sample data
some examples too large to be viable -- unfortunately BIND_human and BIND_yeast show up first in the list of sample files. Suggestion: have a demo directory. GalFiltered files are quite useful, should appear first.
- Distinguish files created by people from those created by machines.
- ACTION ITEMS generate a demo directory
- . users discouraged when they see examples from another domain. Suggestion: work with user community to expand the breadth of the examples.