About this document
This is an official Request for Comment (RFC) for a a new icon set in Cytoscape 2.4.
For details on RFCs in general, check out the [http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Request+for+Comments&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&linktext=Request%20for%20Comments Wikipedia Entry: Request for Comments (RFCs)]
Status
Open for public comment.
How to Comment
To view/add comments, please scroll down to the bottom of the page. By adding your ideas to the Wiki directly, we can more easily organize everyone's ideas, and keep clear records. Be sure to include today's date and your name for each comment.
Try to keep your comments as concrete and constructive as possible. For example, if you find a part of the RFC makes no sense, please say so, but don't stop there. Take the extra step and propose alternatives.
Proposal
I'd like to propose that Cytoscape 2.4 adopt a new, more intuitive set of icons for the main tool bar. The current set of icons is not very intuitive, and a number of users find them very confusing.
As part of this RFC, I have explored a number of icon options:
Linux KDE Icons: see http://www.kde-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=22x27. Lots of beautiful icons, but unfortunately, none of the icon sets support key Cytoscape actions, e.g. zoom selected region.
Linux Gnome Icons: see http://www.gnome-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=120&PHPSESSID=9ca47374357d9e9552e40100e3f5da69. Lots of beautiful icons, but unfortunately, none of the icon sets support key Cytoscape actions, e.g. zoom selected region.
Stock icons from commercial companies. I found a number of relatively cheap icon sets for sale. These range in price from $100-$400. However, many of these icons have redistribution requirements. For example, icons can only be distributed as part of a binary or exe. For an example commercial set of icons, see: http://glyphlab.com/stock_icons/index.html.
Deferred Items
None defined yet.
Open Issues
None defined yet.
Comments
EthanCerami, 07/05/2006 - This is a sample comment to get things started. Blah, blah, blah...